Interviewing Creator Richard Maclean Smith

The coffee shop hummed with that familiar pre-lunch buzz, a symphony of clattering mugs and hushed conversations. I was nursing a lukewarm latte, feeling that slightly frantic energy that comes with trying to mentally prepare for a conversation that could potentially change how you see things. My interviewee, Richard Maclean Smith, was already there, a friendly face amidst the organised chaos. He’d even remembered I liked oat milk, which, let’s be honest, is a small victory in the grand scheme of things.
And then it hit me, as it often does when you’re about to dive into someone’s creative process: how does one become a creator? It’s not like there’s a degree for it, is it? You don’t graduate with a “Master of Making Stuff.” It’s more of a… well, a journey. A messy, glorious, sometimes baffling journey. And Richard? He’s navigated that journey with a fascinating blend of intention and happy accident. He’s the kind of creator who makes you question your own definition of what it means to make something.
So, grab your beverage of choice, settle in, and let’s chat about how Richard Maclean Smith, the mastermind behind some seriously thought-provoking projects, actually does his thing. Because trust me, it’s more than just having a good idea. It’s about the how, the why, and the occasional existential wobble.
Must Read
The Accidental Architect of Experience
Richard’s career isn't a straight line; it's more of a constellation. He’s dabbled in theatre, performance art, even something he vaguely described as “experimental publishing.” It sounds like the kind of thing that would make a corporate recruiter’s hair stand on end, right? But for Richard, it’s all part of a grand tapestry. He’s not just making things; he’s crafting experiences.
“I think for a long time, I resisted calling myself a ‘creator’,” he confessed, stirring his own coffee with a thoughtful frown. “It felt a bit… pretentious. But then you realise, you’re constantly trying to bring something into existence that wasn’t there before. Whether it’s a play, a story, or a particular feeling in a room.”
And that’s the thing, isn’t it? We often think of creators as artists with paintbrushes or writers with quills. But Richard’s work often exists in the ephemeral. It’s about the atmosphere, the interaction, the way a seemingly simple concept can unfold and resonate with people on a deeper level. He’s like an architect, but instead of buildings, he builds moments. Moments that make you think.
Take, for instance, one of his earlier projects where he invited people to write letters to their future selves and then delivered them a year later. Simple, right? But the impact? Profound. It taps into that universal human desire for connection, for reflection, for a tangible link to our own evolving selves. He’s not just writing a story; he’s facilitating one for the participants. You can practically feel the wheels turning in his brain, even when he’s just ordering a croissant.

The Art of the Unforeseen
One of the things that struck me most about Richard is his openness to the unforeseen. He’s not one of those rigid planners who maps out every single step. He builds a framework, a foundation, and then lets the magic happen. And by magic, I mean all the wonderful, messy, unpredictable elements that come with involving other humans or embracing the chaos of the real world.
“You can have the most brilliant plan in the world,” he mused, his eyes twinkling, “but then someone says something brilliant that you never anticipated, or a piece of technology malfunctions in a way that actually opens up a new possibility. You have to be ready to dance with that.”
This is where the irony really kicks in for me. We’re conditioned to believe that success comes from meticulous planning and control. But Richard’s work often thrives on the lack of complete control. It’s about creating fertile ground for ideas to sprout, even if those sprouts go in directions you never imagined. It’s a beautiful surrender, in a way.
He told me a story about a public art installation he’d done where the initial concept involved people interacting with a series of prompts. But what actually emerged was something far more social, far more collaborative. People started improvising, building on each other’s responses, creating a collective narrative that he, as the original instigator, could never have predicted. That’s the beauty of it! He didn’t impose his will; he created a space for a collective imagination to flourish. Talk about a mic drop.
The Power of Curiosity as a Compass
So, how do you cultivate this openness, this willingness to let go? For Richard, it boils down to one fundamental thing: unrelenting curiosity. He’s like a professional question-asker. Not in an interrogative, annoying way, but in a genuine, wide-eyed wonder sort of way.

“I’m just endlessly fascinated by people, by how we tick, by the little stories we carry around,” he explained. “And if you’re genuinely curious, you’re naturally going to be drawn to explore those things. You don’t need a grand plan; you just need to ask ‘what if?’ or ‘why not?’”
This is the secret sauce, isn’t it? We get so caught up in the “how-to” guides and the “proven methods” that we forget the power of simply being interested. Richard’s curiosity isn't just a personality trait; it’s his primary tool. It’s what leads him down rabbit holes, what prompts him to experiment, and what ultimately fuels the unique and compelling nature of his creations.
He’ll spend hours just observing, listening, reading things that seem completely unrelated to his current project. And then, seemingly out of nowhere, a connection will spark. It’s like a mental Rube Goldberg machine, where each curious observation is a little domino that eventually knocks over a brilliant idea. It’s inspiring, and frankly, a little intimidating.
From Concept to Collaboration
Another crucial element of Richard’s process is his understanding of collaboration. He’s not a lone wolf, holed up in an ivory tower. His creations often involve bringing people together, whether as participants, co-creators, or even just unwitting contributors to the unfolding narrative.

“I used to think I had to do it all myself,” he admitted, shaking his head with a wry smile. “But that’s exhausting, and frankly, limiting. The best ideas often come from the friction, the different perspectives that clash and then merge into something new. It’s like mixing colours; you get entirely new hues when you combine them.”
He’s a master at creating environments where people feel safe to contribute, to experiment, and to even fail. This isn’t about imposing his vision; it’s about inviting others into a shared creative space. And that requires a special kind of humility and trust. You have to believe in the collective intelligence, in the power of shared endeavor.
He shared an anecdote about a project where he initially had a very specific idea for a particular outcome. But as the collaborators started working, they brought their own skills and passions to the table. Instead of fighting it, Richard leaned in. The final piece was richer, more layered, and ultimately, more successful because he was willing to share the creative reins. This is the kind of thing that makes you rethink your own team dynamics, right?
The Importance of Process Over Product (Sometimes)
This brings us to a point that often gets overlooked in our product-obsessed world: the value of the process itself. Richard isn’t solely focused on the finished artefact. For him, the journey of creation is as significant, if not more so, than the final outcome.
“The moments of struggle, the dead ends, the unexpected detours – that’s where so much learning happens,” he said, his brow furrowed in thought. “If you’re only focused on the shiny end result, you miss all the fascinating evolution that happens along the way. That’s the real alchemy.”

This is a hard lesson for many of us to learn. We want the instant gratification, the finished product that we can present to the world. But Richard’s approach suggests that by embracing the messiness, the experimentation, and the occasional failure, we actually become better creators. We develop resilience, adaptability, and a deeper understanding of our own creative muscles. It’s like training for a marathon; the miles you run are as important as the finish line.
He’s not afraid to show the seams, the rough edges. In fact, he often highlights them. This transparency demystifies the creative act, making it feel more accessible and less like some mystical power possessed by a select few. He’s essentially saying, “Look, this is how it’s made, with all its bumps and bruises.” And that’s incredibly liberating.
Embracing the “What If”
As our conversation wound down, with the coffee shop now a hive of lunch-goers, I felt a distinct sense of clarity. Richard Maclean Smith isn’t a creator because he has a secret formula or a magic wand. He’s a creator because he’s fundamentally curious, open to collaboration, and unafraid to embrace the beautiful chaos of the creative process.
He embodies a spirit of exploration, a willingness to dive into the unknown and see what emerges. His work isn’t about providing answers; it’s about posing questions, sparking conversations, and inviting us to participate in the act of making meaning. He’s a guide, not a dictator, in the landscape of human experience.
So, the next time you’re wrestling with a creative block, or feeling the pressure to have everything figured out, remember Richard. Remember the power of curiosity. Remember the beauty of collaboration. And most importantly, remember to dance with the unforeseen. Because sometimes, the most extraordinary creations emerge not from meticulous planning, but from a willingness to simply see what happens when you show up, with an open heart and an inquisitive mind. And maybe a good oat milk latte.
